Historical hashrate question
So people always justify Bitcoin as the best crypto because of the hashrate going in to mine Bitcoin.
I think it's unfair to compare something that has first move traction as well as 11 year history with the ticker.
Wouldn't a fairer comparison be done if you looked at instead just straight up hashrate but look at times of same price per coin as well as it's hashrate at that time as well as reward for mining it?
I bet if someone was able to find this data they would find that the hashrate of BCH today is greater than that at a historically comparable BTC time.
The only difference is what it could take today to mess with the coins.
For instance say 3 years into Bitcoins was one of very few options to mine. Therefore getting the hashrate to screw up the network for it then would be alot harder to get when today doing that to BCH would be fairly easily if you were a large scale miner
[link] [comments]