Rick Falkvinge on "winning" the conflict

I would tend to agree that people who think the ends justify the means, any means, will have the upper hand in a conflict.

The key strategy for the other party to win, then, is to strive for there being no conflict, and that they pursue what they think is a viable goal as if the aggressive party didn't even exist. This doesn't mean being complacent; to the contrary, this is extremely aggressive but within the bounds of ethics.

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/kcgswl/the_philosophical_origins_of_bitcoins_civil_war/gftgc2c